Tuesday, September 1, 2026 Trend Press · Cloudflare Pages

The Trend Tribune

"All the trends that are fit to read" Evening Edition Free of Charge
TODAY'S LEAD STORY

Tens of thousands of Mac minis instead of a GPU cluster—the surprising details of OpenAI's chosen training infrastructure.

The Information reported on August 29th that OpenAI has purchased tens of thousands of Mac mini and Mac Studio units, and this article provides a technical explanation of this. It explains why the integrated memory architecture is suitable for reinforcement learning and computer manipulation agent training, the fact that Anthropic is also using a similar approach via AWS, the impact on the supply chain that has extended Apple's delivery times from several weeks to several months, the earlier-than-expected August 25th release of M6 chip-equipped products, and how this is positioned as a way to differentiate usage for different workloads rather than replacing GPU clusters.

Tens of thousands of Mac minis instead of a GPU cluster—the surprising details of OpenAI's chosen training infrastructure.
(Photo: illustrative)

Tens of thousands of Mac minis instead of GPU clusters: The surprising training infrastructure chosen by OpenAI

According to a report by The Information on August 29th, OpenAI has been purchasing tens of thousands of Apple Mac minis and Mac Studios over the past few months. This is for reinforcement learning and training AI agents that interact with computers. What's interesting from an engineer's perspective is the technical reason why consumer-grade desktop computers were chosen for this purpose, rather than NVIDIA GPU clusters.

The unexpected suitability of "unified memory"

Behind this choice lies the characteristics of the "unified memory" architecture used in Apple's chips. Normally, CPUs and GPUs have separate memory spaces, but Apple's silicon is designed so that the CPU and GPU share a single memory pool.

Why is this design suitable for training computer-operating agents? Because the workload of this type of reinforcement learning is significantly different in nature from the pre-training of typical transformer models. Computer-operated agents actually run within the operating system, observing what is displayed on the screen, taking actions, and learning by receiving feedback from the results millions of times. This process requires relatively light parallelism while using a large amount of memory, rather than massive parallel computing. This characteristic perfectly aligns with the strengths of Apple's integrated memory architecture.

Anthropic also makes a similar move via AWS

This trend is not limited to OpenAI. According to the same report, Anthropic, supported by Google and Amazon, is also taking a similar approach, renting the computing power of Mac minis via Amazon Web Services (AWS) and using it for its reinforcement learning tasks. The fact that Frontier AI Labs have reached the same technical conclusion, even if not by prior arrangement, suggests that the suitability of Apple silicon for this application is not mere coincidence.

Demand is so large that it is straining Apple's supply chain

The scale of this demand is even impacting Apple's own product supply plans. For high-performance Mac mini and Mac Studio configurations with large amounts of memory, delivery times are reportedly extending from several weeks to several months. Apple brought forward its product refresh, normally scheduled for the fall, to August 25th, introducing the new M6 chip (Apple's first chip manufactured using a 2-nanometer process) in the Mac mini, and the M5 Pro, M5 Max, and M5 Ultra in the Mac Studio.

CEO Tim Cook has reportedly warned that this shortage will continue for several months after this product refresh. This indicates that large enterprise orders are beginning to directly impact regular consumer demand.

Positioning as a "differential use" rather than a "GPU replacement"

An important caveat here is that this development does not mean OpenAI is breaking away from its reliance on NVIDIA GPU clusters. Large, tightly coupled GPU clusters are still essential for pre-training frontier models, and NVIDIA's dominance in this regard remains unchallenged.

The use of the Mac mini in this instance is positioned as a complementary option for specific types of workloads—specifically, the computational demands of reinforcement learning and agent training, which have different natures. This suggests that a multi-architecture configuration, where data centers use NVIDIA accelerators for training, their own chip designs for inference, and Apple silicon-based systems for specific agent-related tasks, may become more common in the future.

The "Unintended By-product" Aspect for Apple

Interestingly, this application appears to be something Apple did not initially anticipate. Apple's goal in developing its own chips and transitioning from Intel CPUs was primarily to improve the efficiency and performance of personal computers. However, the resulting integrated memory design has unexpectedly proven to be a strength in areas where the weight of AI models with enormous parameter counts needs to be handled efficiently.

Apple's Mac business sales in the most recent quarter recorded a 29% increase year-over-year, and it has been suggested that large purchases from AI labs may be supporting part of this growth. Apple is arguably becoming an unintentional winner in the AI ​​infrastructure investment competition, as it can benefit from this type of demand without requiring massive investments in data centers.

What Engineers Should Note

This news indicates a clear trend towards AI model training and inference, moving away from a single hardware architecture and towards selecting the optimal hardware based on the nature of the workload. We may see further optimization for specific applications, such as GPU clusters for large-scale transformer pre-training, dedicated accelerators for efficiency-focused inference, and Apple silicon for memory-intensive agent training.

When designing your own AI development infrastructure, it will become increasingly important to move beyond a simplistic approach of "simply adding more GPUs" and instead consider what each workload actually demands, flexibly examining hardware options accordingly.

OpenAIAppleAIインフラ強化学習AI/ML

The gamble of "not choosing to walk on two legs" gave birth to Europe's first unicorn.

London-based Humanoid has completed a $152 million Series A funding round, valuing the company at $1.35 billion, becoming Europe's first humanoid-focused unicorn just two years after its founding. This article examines the company's strategy of choosing a wheeled robot instead of a bipedal one to benefit from faster European product certification, its large-scale pre-orders of 30,000 units and its industry-leading commercial contract with Schaeffler, its five-year partnership to build a 100,000-unit manufacturing capacity with Bosch, its collaborative model involving industry heavyweights as manufacturing partners rather than mere investors, and its realistic timeline of a beta deployment in Q4 2026.

The Gamble of "Not Choosing Bipedalism" Creates Europe's First Unicorn

London-based startup Humanoid has announced that it has completed a $152 million Series A funding round, valuing its robot at $1.35 billion, becoming Europe's first "humanoid-focused" unicorn company. This achievement comes just two years after its founding. As a software developer, I'd like to highlight the company's design philosophy—the deliberate choice of "wheels"—and its significance in the European market.

A Clear Technological Choice: "Wheeled Humanoid"

Humanoid's "HMND 01" has a human-like upper body, but its lower body uses wheels instead of bipedalism. This design philosophy is similar to the approach taken by AI² Robotics, a Chinese company we previously covered.

Humanoid's official explanation for this choice is intriguing. They state that the wheeled design offers the advantage of faster product certification in Europe compared to bipedal robots. For humanoid robots to be commercially deployed, obtaining safety certifications in each country and region is an unavoidable hurdle. The speed of this certification process is a crucial practical factor that significantly impacts the time to actual market launch.

Specific Demand Backing: 30,000 Units on Order

Evaluating this fundraising is crucial not only for its technical potential but also for the concrete order track record already accumulated. Humanoid reportedly has a backlog of 30,000 pre-orders, and this funding will be used to translate this backlog into actual production.

Of particular note is the contract with Schaeffler, a major German parts manufacturer. This is the largest publicly announced commercial contract in the industry, and it anticipates the deployment of thousands of humanoid robots in manufacturing environments. The company has already signed a contract with Bosch to establish a manufacturing capacity of 100,000 robot bodies over five years through a partnership.

Support from Industry Heavyweights: Bosch and Schaeffler

The Series A round was led by Prime Movers Lab, an investor in disruptive technologies, but the list of participating investors speaks volumes about the company's position. Schaeffler and Bosch, two leading European industrial companies, are listed not merely as funders, but as strategic partners.

Bosch is also in a position to provide technical support in hardware design and production as a contract manufacturing partner for Humanoid. This is a unique collaborative model, different from the Chinese and US humanoid companies we've seen so far, where an emerging robotics company incorporates the expertise of traditional European manufacturing.

The Geopolitical Significance of the "First in Europe" Title

Another significant aspect of this news is the regional competitive landscape in the humanoid robot industry. As previously discussed, this field has been dominated by Chinese companies (Unitree, AgiBot, XPeng, etc.) and US companies (Tesla, Figure AI, Agility Robotics, etc.).

As Humanoid founder Artem Sokolov stated, "We will demonstrate that a globally competitive physical AI company can be built and scaled in Europe." This funding round is seen as a symbolic event, indicating the possibility of a third force originating from Europe challenging this two-company structure. However, the actual delivery time and the extent to which they can reliably fulfill their 30,000-unit backlog will depend on their execution capabilities going forward.

A Realistic Timeline: Beta Deployment in Q4

These funds are planned to be used for the development of next-generation robots, commercial deployment with major industry partners, and the evolution of their proprietary AI platform, "KinetIQ." Specifically, they plan to deploy beta units in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Based on the examples of other humanoid companies we've covered so far, there's often a significant gap between the "planned deployment timeline" and "actual operation at a commercial scale." It will be necessary to closely monitor Humanoid's progress to see how steadily they can execute this ambitious timeline and their backlog of 30,000 units.

What Software Professionals Should Notice

Humanoid's case demonstrates the effectiveness of a more practical approach, distinct from the grand vision of a "bipedal, general-purpose humanoid" that's mainstream in the industry. By choosing a more technologically mature mechanism—wheels—they've achieved both rapid regulatory compliance and ease of collaboration with existing industry partners.

The deep involvement of traditional European manufacturing heavyweights, not merely as investors but as manufacturing partners, also indicates that this company is looking beyond mere technology demonstrations and is aiming to build a real mass production system. Going forward, I will be closely watching how quickly the contract with Schaeffler is actually put into action, and to what extent this European humanoid company can exert its presence against Chinese and American competitors.

ヒューマノイド欧州資金調達フィジカルAI製造業

With 160 employees and 7.4 trillion yen in funding, DeepSeek chose an unconventional fundraising strategy: "giving shareholders no say in the matter."

Multiple sources have reported that DeepSeek is expected to complete a fundraising round of 5 billion yuan (US$7.4 billion) by the end of August, with a pre-money valuation of 50 billion yuan. This report will analyze the accounting aspects of the unusual structure of the June round, in which Tencent, JD.com, and CATL participated without a 5-year lock-up or voting rights, the preferential position of the National AI Industry Investment Fund which only received voting rights and lock-up exemption, the 20 billion yuan investment by founder Liang personally, the productivity of valuing each employee at US$460 million, the actual revenue scale of US$500 million (ARR) of less than 0.7% of the valuation, and the company's move into the robotics field, including the acquisition of Unitree shares.

160 Employees, 7.4 Trillion Yen – DeepSeek's Unconventional Fundraising Strategy: Giving Shareholders No Voice

Multiple media outlets have reported that Chinese AI company DeepSeek is expected to complete a new fundraising round of approximately 5 billion yuan (7.4 billion dollars) by the end of August. The pre-money valuation has reached approximately 50 billion yuan (7.4 billion dollars), and this move is seen as a move toward a listing on the Shanghai STAR Market in 2027. As an accountant, I want to draw attention to the extremely unusual share structure incorporated into this fundraising.

An Unusual Condition: A 5-Year Lock-Up with No Voting Rights

First, it's important to understand the unique capital structure adopted in the previous 7.4 billion dollar fundraising round conducted in June. It has been reported that prominent commercial investors such as Tencent, JD.com, and CATL (a major battery manufacturer) participated in this fundraising round by accepting conditions of a 5-year lock-up period prohibiting the sale of shares and having no voting rights whatsoever.

Typically, institutional investors of this size would secure certain voting rights and disclosure rights when investing. However, in DeepSeek's case, prominent commercial investors have invested funds while waiving these usual rights. This could be seen as evidence of the investors' strong confidence in DeepSeek's future potential, but it also means that external governance checks on the company's management are extremely limited.

The Special Status Only "State Investment Funds" Enjoy

What makes this structure even more interesting is the difference in treatment among investors. The Chinese government-affiliated "National Artificial Intelligence Industry Investment Fund" has been granted a clearly superior status compared to other commercial investors, as it invests directly, retains voting rights, and is not subject to lock-up agreements.

This is an important clue indicating that DeepSeek is clearly positioned not only within the framework of a purely private company's fundraising logic, but also within China's national AI strategy.

An Unprecedented Personal Commitment: The Founder Invests 2 Billion Yuan

Another noteworthy point is the depth of involvement from founder Liang Wenfeng himself. He reportedly invested 20 billion yuan (approximately $3 billion) personally in the June funding round. Such a large-scale personal investment is extremely unusual for an AI company of this size.

DeepSeek has historically relied on years of self-funding through Liang's quantitative hedge fund, "High-Flyer." This series of fundraising rounds can be seen as a gradual shift from a structure where the founder effectively controls everything to one that accepts more external capital.

An Extremely Productive Figure: "160 People, $74 Billion"

When considering DeepSeek's valuation, the company's employee size is strikingly impressive. According to reports, DeepSeek has only about 160 employees. If an organization of this size has reached a valuation of $74 billion, the valuation per employee would be an extraordinary $460 million.

This reflects DeepSeek's high reputation within the industry for its ability to develop low-cost, high-performance AI models. The company's "R1" model, released in January 2025, reportedly achieved performance comparable to major Western AI models at a significantly lower cost, shocking the global AI industry.

An "Annual Recurring Revenue of $500 Million": A Figure Disproportionate to Scale

On the other hand, there are figures that require a more cautious accounting examination. DeepSeek's annual recurring revenue (ARR) is reported to be only around $500 million. This is less than 0.7% of its $74 billion valuation.

The company is still considered to be in a growth investment phase, experiencing cash burn due to business expansion. The extent to which this enormous valuation and the still limited actual revenue scale can be justified for investors depends on the sustainability of its technological advantage and the pace of its monetization going forward.

Expanding the Business: Laying the Groundwork for Robotics

Another noteworthy development is that High-Flyer, which is affiliated with DeepSeek, has begun investing in China's hardware and robotics sector. A High-Flyer affiliate acquired $26 million worth of pre-IPO shares of memory chip manufacturer CXMT, and DeepSeek itself reportedly acquired a 2.31% stake in Unitree Robotics during its IPO, as previously discussed.

This suggests that DeepSeek is moving beyond being merely an AI model development company and is strengthening its role as an investor in the entire Chinese AI and robotics industry.

Points to Note from an Accountant's Perspective

DeepSeek's current fundraising structure demonstrates a unique governance model adopted by Chinese AI companies, where they accept external capital while maintaining effective control through their founders and state-backed funds. The condition of not granting voting rights to commercial investors is unusual from the perspective of typical capital market logic, but the fact that investors have accepted this condition reflects the market's strong expectations for DeepSeek's technological capabilities and future potential.

The current ARR of $500 million will expand at a rapid pace leading up to the planned IPO in Shanghai in 2027. Furthermore, the extent to which the $74 billion valuation will be supported by the market at the time of the actual listing will be a crucial test case for predicting the fundraising and IPO trends of Chinese AI companies.

DeepSeek中国資金調達IPOファイナンス
Advertisement300 × 250